Health Care and Overtime—Do the Twain Meet in 2014?

This month’s post from guest blogger, Vicki Lambert:

The passage of the Affordable Care Act has certainly generated questions in the payroll
community. Will the taxation of health care change? No it is still nontaxable. Will it need to be
reported on the Form W-2 anyway? Yes, but not mandatory until 2012. But one question is still
outstanding and is in fact not being raised quite as strongly as the other two and that is… Will
health insurance being paid for by employers have to be included in calculating regular rate of
pay under the Fair Labor Standards Act?

The law states that employers must offer their employees’ health care coverage or face a penalty
beginning in 2014. The law does not give a mandate that employers must offer health care, only
that they will be penalized if they don’t. And there is an exception for under a certain number of
employees so small employers will not be penalized at all. This is as close to a mandate on fringe
benefits as we have ever come on the national level.

The question arises because the Fair Labor Standards Act requires that all remuneration for
employment unless specifically excluded be included in the regular rate of pay for overtime
calculations. These excluded items are sometimes referred to as “statutory exclusions” and
they are spelled out in the laws. For example, payments for hours not worked are excluded.
These include the fringe benefits of vacation, sick or holiday pay. But these are specifically
listed and are made in most cases voluntarily by the employer. It also lists payments made to
a bona fide plan providing old-age, life or health insurance. But these are contributions made
on behalf of the employee to the employer’s plan. Does this change if the employer is making
the contribution to avoid a penalty by the government? Does this now make the payment
remuneration?

I contacted the Department of Labor directly to find the answers to these questions. I was
referred to the Employee Benefits Security Administration (EBSA). They’re answer…they don’t
know yet. They are looking into the matter to make a determination. The new law is just not
clear enough right now. This is unchartered territory with a new concept for employers in the 21st
century hitting smack up against a law written in 1938. So we will have to wait and see if we
need to include the payment for health care in the regular rate of pay in 2014.

In the meantime maybe this should open up the debate of whether or not these older wage and
hour laws should be revisited for the 21st century. But that is the topic for another blog.

Vicki M. Lambert, CPP
www.thepayrolladvisor.com

Holidays and Taxes – Part 1

Greetings readers.  The next three blog posts will discuss some things that will help you during – and right after- the holiday season.  This week, I’ll discuss employee holiday parties and gifts to employees.  Next week, I’ll discuss year end planning tips. The end of the month will be about making some new goals for the new year.  Perhaps there will be time for one more summarizing tax law changes that should have been passed by Congress by that time.

Gift Cards
According to some statistics software attached to this blog, my post a couple years ago on employee gift cards and taxability is consistently the most visited page on this site.  It seems there is a lot of confusion regarding employer responsibility and payments to employees for holiday bonuses and gifts.  Somehow, the notion has entered the minds of the taxpaying public that if you give money or gift cards to employees below $25 or $50 that the amount is not taxable.  That is absolutely false.  The key to withholding on an employee gift is whether or not the value can be tracked easily.  If you give turkeys to all your employees, they cannot exchange that for cash, and determining the value of each turkey as it is given to an employee is nearly impossible.  If you give $25 gift cards to all your employees, it is very easy to determine the value: $25.  This amount should be taxed appropriately.  Likely, you will need to “gross up” the value.  A $25 gift card using supplemental rates could cost the company nearly $50 once payroll, withholding and unemployment taxes are added into it.  There is a simple gross up calculator available at PaycheckCity.com.  It is free to use after  registration.  This tool will tell you the cost from the paycheck perspective.

Holiday Parties
According to the IRS, the cost of  holding an employee holiday party can be deducted 100% as business expense.  As an employer, this can give your employees a chance to relax and talk about non-work topics.  It also causes team building.  Holiday parties should not be overly extravagant.  Think of the old Tyco/Koslowski debacle.  Having a reasonable party that shows your appreciation for their hard work during the year is a great way to give back and avoid the cost of giving out trinkets or gift cards.  You can find many articles that can help you provide guidelines for your employees during one of these parties.  You want it to be the social event of the year, but not because you ended up with a sexual harassment or discrimination lawsuit on your hands.

What if you invited clients to attend the party as well?  This actually takes away part of the deductible nature of the party.  Now it is for advertising purposes which means only 50% of the cost of the party can be deducted.  So you say, “I’ll just send my customers a nice gift like a goodie box from Fairytale Brownies or Rocky Mountain Chocolate Factory.”  Keep in mind that there is a limit on these as well for tax purposes.  For marketing purposes, spend as much as you want on a customer.  For tax purposes, you can only deduct up to $25 of the cost of gifts to your clients/customers.

Self-Employed on Unemployment?

Q. I am a OTR driver and am the only person working for this company. Now he’s shutting down the company. He classified me as self employed. Can I draw unemployment? I do not have a home, but license is North Carolina. Employer was in Nebraska.

A. The arrangement between you and the company providing your work is very important to get right.  The key here is, how much financial and behavioral control over your work did the hiring entity have?  If he provided your truck and directed all of the shipments you hauled, you may have been an employee.  If you have your own truck and were allowed to contract with other companies, you may actually be independent.  How have you filed your tax return since working with this individual?  Did you use Schedule C, which is typical for self-employed individuals?  Were you provided a 1099 or W-2 at the end of previous years?

The biggest problem with mis-classification is when termination, layoff or work stoppage occurs.  Employers typically attempt to avoid the employee classification simply to save money on the Social Security/Medicare match, unemployment taxes and workmen’s compensation insurance.  If you were actually an employee, then you are due unemployment compensation.  If you were not, then you are not eligible to collect unemployment benefits.  It makes sense that as a self-employed individual, it is my responsibility to keep myself busy.  If I am not finding enough work and lose clients, it is my own responsibility to find more business. No unemployment benefits should be received.  In an employee/employer situation, it is the employer’s responsibility to pay into the unemployment system and thus provide benefits for those employees who are terminated.

The state where you were based is likely the state where you will need to attempt to collect unemployment.  That state will make the determination if you were truly an employee or not.  If it is determined that you were not, you are out of luck.  This may take some time to sort out unfortunately.  In the meantime, the best thing you can do is find another source or income instead of waiting around for an answer. You can read a more in depth article a few years back regarding this topic as well.

The IRS also has a very good publication regarding worker classification.  You can read it here.

—–
Samuel Kerch, CPA

Circular 230 Disclosure: To ensure compliance with requirements imposed by the IRS, we inform you that any U.S. tax advice contained in this communication (including any attachments) is not intended or written to be used, and cannot be used, for the purpose of (i) avoiding penalties under the Internal Revenue Code, or (ii) promoting, marketing or recommending to another party any matters addressed herein.Circular 230 Disclosure: To ensure compliance with requirements imposed by the IRS, we inform you that any U.S. tax advice contained in this communication (including any attachments) is not intended or written to be used, and cannot be used, for the purpose of (i) avoiding penalties under the Internal Revenue Code, or (ii) promoting, marketing or recommending to another party any matters addressed herein.

Taxes Cause Fireworks Too?

Q. We recently ran a fireworks stand for a business in another state.  They have stands over about 4 different states and they hire people to manage them for them.  This was our first year running the stand.  We sold off of commission.  We were to receive 20-25% of net sales that we took in.  I just received the check from the company.  The check made out to me in the amount of just over $6,000.  It is my understanding that when tax time comes, I will be receiving a 1099 for that amount.

Here is my problem, I do not want to have to pay taxes on the full amount when I’m planning on giving about $4,500 in wages to 9 workers.  I also have about $500 in expenses.  The way it looks to me right now, is that in April, I will be paying income tax on the whole amount.  Can I write them checks as contract labor?  If so, what is the max on it?  How do I show those expenses after I get the 1099 so it doesn’t look like I received the whole $6,000?

A. Taxes, Taxes, Taxes.  Everyone seems to want to avoid paying taxes on their income for some reason.  Actually, it is your legal right to only pay the taxes you actually owe.  You should be taking advantage of all possible legal deduction opportunities that are available in the tax code.  In your case, yes, you will receive a 1099 for the amount you earned running the stand.  The arrangement described almost sounds like a franchising opportunity. I wonder whether you are actually “self-employed” as you are being classified or if you are indeed an employee.  I wrote an article about that one awhile back that you can read here.

If you are actually considered a small business, then you need to track your expenses incurred while running the stand like a regular business would.  As a self-employed individual, the income and expenses from your business will be reported to the IRS on Schedule C of the tax return.  Schedule C allows many types of deductions.  You can read instructions for that form here.  Valid expenses could be everything from vehicle mileage or depreciation, office supplies, employee and benefit expenses, licenses you were required to purchase, business meals, commissions, insurance, etc.  If you paid people to run the stand with you, those people were likely employees and should have been paid and reported properly through a payroll system.  Basically a valid expense is something that a an auditor would allow during the course of an examination.  If you take a conservative approach and have receipts and documentation for expenses, you are much more likely to keep your claimed expenses from being denied if you are audited.

Of course, the best way to make sure you are doing this correctly is to retain the services of a knowledgeable accountant.  Both the IRS and the state government will have unique tax laws relating to your situation.  Your accountant will become your trusted advisor while guiding you through the labyrinth of tax laws that exist today and helping you make better business decisions.  Good luck!

—–
Samuel Kerch, CPA

Circular 230 Disclosure: To ensure compliance with requirements imposed by the IRS, we inform you that any U.S. tax advice contained in this communication (including any attachments) is not intended or written to be used, and cannot be used, for the purpose of (i) avoiding penalties under the Internal Revenue Code, or (ii) promoting, marketing or recommending to another party any matters addressed herein.Circular 230 Disclosure: To ensure compliance with requirements imposed by the IRS, we inform you that any U.S. tax advice contained in this communication (including any attachments) is not intended or written to be used, and cannot be used, for the purpose of (i) avoiding penalties under the Internal Revenue Code, or (ii) promoting, marketing or recommending to another party any matters addressed herein.

HHS Wants Us Fit—IRS Wants the Tax

It’s been in the news a lot lately—how unfit Americans have become. The First Lady is advocating programs to fight childhood obesity while AARP started an online movement to get its members fit over this summer. Everyone is being asked to join in and help. But for employers and especially for payroll helping fight obesity is a two-edged sword. If the employer takes office space and puts in a gym on site for employees to use under IRS regulations it is tax free. According to Publication 15-B:

Athletic Facilities
You can exclude the value of an employee’s use of an on-premises gym or other athletic facility you operate from an employee’s wages if substantially all use of the facility during the calendar year is by your employees, their spouses, and their dependent children. For this purpose, an employee’s dependent child is a child or stepchild who is the employee’s dependent or who, if both parents are deceased, has not attained the age of 25.
On-premises facility. The athletic facility must be located on premises you own or lease. It does not have to be located on your business premises. However, the exclusion does not apply to an athletic facility for residential use, such as athletic facilities that are part of a resort.

The added bonus of offering an on-site gym is the employee good will it creates. But for the employer to use valuable and sometimes nonexistent “extra” office space to put in a gym can cause a lot of “bad will” among workers who are crammed into cubicles. And let’s face it not too many companies have an extra 500 square feet just laying empty. Plus I really have to ask how many of us overweight and out of shape payroll professionals want to huff, puff, and sweat in front of our staff and fellow co-workers. I know I never did. Plus with no shower facilities it could make the small and cramped payroll office somewhat—shall we say, unpleasant. And if the employer does put in a shower, I really don’t want to strip and shower in front of my staff!

But the employer really wants to offer a healthier lifestyle to its employees. And they also want to help other local businesses by buying services. So they buy a gym membership for all their employees. It might be a one-off benefit or even part of a larger and more complex wellness program that includes quitting smoking and diet tips. Either way it doesn’t matter. If the employer buys the gym membership everyone is paying taxes on it. FIT, FICA, FUTA, SIT, SDI (where required), SUI, Local Taxes–all of them. In essence the employer is made to pay more simply because they don’t want a gym next to their conference room.

My point is if the government wants Americans to get fit why make it harder and more expensive to buy a gym membership rather than gym equipment. Why should employers and their employees have to pay more for basically the same thing? Putting in a gym or buying a membership should be the same thing if it is for the employee’s health and for the health of America.

Vicki M. Lambert, CPP
www.thepayrolladvisor.com

Social Security Started Over

Q. I have a unique variation of your “Social Security Tax on Everything” post… My wife’s small company decided to change their paycheck provider in July. The provider “reset” all employees yearly total earnings to zero and are therefore collecting the Social security tax from scratch. The provider claims they have to do this by IRS law. My wife had already paid the maximum of $6621.60. Will we be able to get the overpayment for the rest of the year back on our taxes? The instructions for line 69 of 1040, and form 843, seem to indicate that if your employer overwitholds then you are ineligible for a refund. She has not changed employers, just paycheck providers.

A.  This is a very good question.  Unfortunately, there is not enough information to answer your question.  It sounds like this employer may have switched to a PEO also known as a Professional Employer Organization.  Sometimes these are referred to as Employee Leasing Companies.  When an employer joins a PEO, the employer of record changes from the employee perspective and all Social Security and unemployment taxes start over for each employee.  PEOs can be a big cost savings for an employer by allowing a bunch of smaller employers to pool together for health insurance purposes to become one big client.  In your case, it would restart SS withholding however because technically, there is a different employer.  If this is not the case, I have no idea why SS would have started over.  Simply switching payroll providers would not cause this problem because the employer would be the same.  The employer would also feed in all Year-To-Date information from the old payroll provider to keep this kind of problem from surfacing.

Your second comment however is incorrect.  You can still obtain a refund of excess Social Security withholding from a single employer.  However, you must first ask the employer to refund the tax.  This quote is taken directly from the instructions from IRS Form 843 which is needed to request this kind of repayment, “A refund of excess social security or railroad retirement (RRTA) tax withheld by any one employer, but only if the employer will not adjust the overcollection.”  Refunds are available if your employer simply will not work with you.

—–
Samuel Kerch, CPA

Circular 230 Disclosure: To ensure compliance with requirements imposed by the IRS, we inform you that any U.S. tax advice contained in this communication (including any attachments) is not intended or written to be used, and cannot be used, for the purpose of (i) avoiding penalties under the Internal Revenue Code, or (ii) promoting, marketing or recommending to another party any matters addressed herein.Circular 230 Disclosure: To ensure compliance with requirements imposed by the IRS, we inform you that any U.S. tax advice contained in this communication (including any attachments) is not intended or written to be used, and cannot be used, for the purpose of (i) avoiding penalties under the Internal Revenue Code, or (ii) promoting, marketing or recommending to another party any matters addressed herein.

Sole Proprietor on Payroll?

A good question today for discussion:
“My husband is self-employed with no other employees.  I generate his paychecks.  This year, he has been doing a few jobs outside of our county; therefore, the local tax amounts vary from county to county.  The payroll program I use is a very basic program so there are not a lot of different options to use.  (This is a new program I started using this year.)  To keep local taxes correct, I have to issue him a check for each job completed outside of our county.  When I generated a paycheck to him for a small job in a different county, ($300 paycheck), I noticed there were no federal withholding taxes.  I didn’t know this before, but it appears tax calculations are different based on daily, weekly, monthly, etc. pay periods.  I played around with this in the program and noticed the variance each time I changed this option.  With the flexibility of him being self-employed, I generate a paycheck on an as-needed basis to cover our personal needs.  It is never a fixed amount and the frequency varies. Taking the issue of local tax variances out of the picture, I am now worried if the federal and state taxes are being calculated correctly because of the varied amounts and time frames of the paychecks.  I don’t know whether to choose the option of him getting paid daily, weekly, bi-monthly or monthly. The federal and state withholdings changes in each of these categories.  I feel that it is incorrect to have no federal withholding if I generate a paycheck to him for only $300.00.  Can you help?”

A.  Your question contains one of the most common misconceptions of those who are self-employed.  You did not state if you were an LLC, S corp or a C corp.  I assume by your use of the words “self-employed” that you are simply a Schedule C filer with the IRS.  Most of the included fact pattern is actually irrelevant to answer your question.  Simply put, schedule C sole proprietors do not receive paychecks.  The profit earned from the business each year is the “paycheck” for your husband for tax purposes.  You will pay income taxes based on the profit of the business, less any allowed personal deductions on the form 1040.  Self-employed individuals make estimated payments to the IRS based on their estimated tax liability each year.  These estimated payments are made on a quarterly basis.  Your CPA or tax adviser should be able to look at your situation and determine what estimated payments are required.

While you do not have employees now, it is important to note that when you do have employees, you should match your pay frequency with the way you pay.  If you are having employees work in a different city each day, and your payroll system cannot accommodate multiple city tax rates, you would pay based upon a daily frequency for federal, state and local purposes.  If you pay daily and use any other table, the amount of wages will be too low to trigger withholding for federal and state in most cases.  If you think about it, $300 per day is about $81,000 when annualized (assuming a 270 day work year).  If you annualized $300 using a weekly table, it only adds up to $15,600 of gross wages.  There must be a low-cost system available that could handle such a problem when you get to the point of actually having employees and needing it.

——-
Samuel Kerch, CPA

A Job Hunting Secret

At my day job at Symmetry Software, we have been searching for some new employees to fill some open positions.  We are outsourcing the candidate search to a local employment agency.  In this economy, with almost 10% of  those looking for a job unemployed, there is a huge pool of well qualified labor just waiting to be had.  We have interviewed several folks over the last few weeks.  Throughout these interviews, I see one common problem that keeps us from hiring candidates that are good people and very well qualified.

When you are shopping for a new car, do you go in to a dealership without researching and determining which car you are looking for?   Do you accept the words of the salesman to understand what you are buying?

What if you were trying to figure out which college or university to attend?  Would you determine the best schools based on your interests, or would you simply find the closest one to your home?

There are two sides to a job interview; the employer and the applicant.  The employer tries to find out everything possible about the prospective employee before offering a job.  This could include searches of Facebook posts, Google searches for a name, background and credit checks and finally, the actual interview.  That is where the secret lies.

If you make it to an interview, preparation is absolutely the most important thing you can do.  That includes rehearsing answers to potential questions, dressing up, planning to arrive early and preparing extra copies of resumes to distribute.  The employer however, wants to know if you know what you are getting into.  Did you research the company first?  What do they do?  What product lines do they offer?  Do these interrelate?  If you have no idea what the company does, then you will stumble when asked questions about your prospective employer.  That sends a signal that you don’t take things seriously.   Stumbling around trying to make a cohesive answer about something that is so dear to the heart of this prospective employer will win no points.  In fact, it will likely cost you the position.

At least having some familiarity with the structure and product lines of a company will allow you to ask clarifying questions.  This gives the employer the notion that you actually care about the company and that you are not a “fly by the seat of your pants” kind of person.  I think you’ll find that prospective employers will take more notice of what you bring to the table with this trick.

——-
Samuel Kerch, CPA

First-Time Employer, What Do I Do?

Q. I have a pretty new business in Arizona and will soon be hiring my first employees for a big job.  They will be temporary only.  What do I do?  Should I just call them contractors and give them a 1099?

A. Good question and probably one  of the most frequent questions from new employers.  You need to determine the level of control you will have over the workers to decide if these are contractors or really employees.  In most cases, you have employees.

Some of the items to keep in mind when hiring your first employees.

• You will need a federal Employer ID Number if you don’t already have one. You can apply for this online.
• You will need a withholding/unemployment account set up with the state. In Arizona, that happens here. Click on License a New Business and complete the application. This needs to be done soon but not necessarily before the job.
• Submit a new hire report to the state.  This helps the state locate the individual if they owe child support, www.az-newhire.com
• Run e-verify using I-9 data to ensure verify they are eligible to work in the US. Click E-verify enrollment under Tools on the right side. You do need to register before using this service.
• Each new employee needs to complete a form W-4 (federal withholding)
• (In Arizona) Each new employee needs to complete a form A-4 (Arizona withholding). Many states have an equivalent withholding form.
• I-9 (verification of right to work)
• Get Publication 15 from IRS.  This well-written document gives employers the instructions to properly handle withholding and employees.

There are many labor laws that apply as well depending on your number of employees.  To find answers to questions surrounding overtime and other labor laws, you have two options.

1. The Department of Labor website, http://www.dol.gov
2. Your state Labor Department website.  There is a list of those here.

This is a lot of information to absorb for a small business owner.  One other option you may wish to pursue is to contact a local CPA or payroll firm to help you stay compliant.  Your specialty is the industry that you are in, not running payroll.  Connecting with someone who already knows how to do this via outsourcing can make your task much easier.

S Corp Shareholder Health Benefits

Q. A 2% shareholder of an s corporation is also an emploeye.  The corporation offers health insurance under a premium only 125 cafeteria plan.  Is the shareholder/employee eligible to participate?  If so should the corporation’s contribution be reported as wages?

A. There are lots of good articles already on the web about 2% shareholders of S corporations. These would of course be secondary resources on the topic but they can provide coverage from the perspective of those who work in this field every day.

The key is that the IRS considers an S corp to be a partnership when dealing with employee fringe benefits.  If the company pays for the health insurance of a 2% shareholder, it is allowed to take a deduction for that benefit.  The full amount of that premium would be considered taxable income to the shareholder/employee.  So…yes, a shareholder can participate in the plan, but cannot get pre-tax treatment like the rest of the employees would under a section 125 or “cafeteria plan”.

Some states do not allow single person health plans to be purchased as a business.  If the 2% shareholder is the only shareholder in the S corp, then perhaps he should consider hiring his spouse to enable them to purchase a business plan.  Otherwise, health insurance must be purchased as an individual and can only be deducted once it passes 7.5% of AGI on the tax return if the individual itemizes.

The IRS published a bulletin about this topic that goes into much more detail.  It is IRB 2008-2 and can be found here.